Heroic speech from former US Senator Nancy Schaefer

Speech from former US Senator Nancy Schaefer -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmdYIJQLdCs

CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator Schafer
Alex Jones TV

Washington Senator Pam Roach and Former Senator Nancy Schaefer: “CPS is Corrupt”

We were joined by two very special guests to discuss Child Protective Services and Parental Rights. Although these two notable figures live great distances apart, their noble goals are remarkably similar. Nancy Schaefer and Pam Roach made special appearances on Get Your Justice Live Wednesday April 29, 2009. A common theme that both leaders agreed on is that “CPS is Corrupt.”

EPISODE211 - Senator Pam Roach and Former Senator Nancy Schaefer Live [1:13:38m]: Hide Player | Play in Popup

Nancy Schaefer is president of Eagle Forum of Georgia. She served in the Georgia State Senate for four years. She has been a staunch defender of parents’ rights and will also assume the position of Eagle Forum’s National Chairman of Parents’ Rights. She is president of Family Concerns, Inc. and represented Eagle Forum at the Untied Nations conferences in Beijing, Istanbul, Rome and New York. Nancy Schaefer is well-known for a scathing report titled “The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services” that was originally released on November 16, 2007 and later updated on September 25, 2008. (Download Available)

State Senator Pam Roach continues to serve in the Washington State Senate for 19 years. In the year 2000, Senator Roach and her son Representative Dan Roach became the first mother/son duo to represent the same district at the same time. Throughout her years of service she has represented the U.S. in East Timor for the International Republican Institute; hosted a radio talk show on KIRO in Seattle; and is founder of an NGO in Honduras among other accomplishments. As Judiciary chair she authored landmark bills on juvenile justice and DUI. Senator Roach chaired the Children and Family Services Committee and continues to advocate for children and parental rights. This year Senator Roach chaired a special legislative committee to shine light on the lack of accountability and trampling of parental rights by the Child Protective Services. She continues to demand accountability within Child Protective Services today.

——————————————-

You can learn more about Eagle Forum by visiting their website at http://www.eagleforum.org and also find additional resources pertaining to the Pam Roach Report at http://pamroachreport.blogspot.com. By referring your own legislators to these resources, organizations, and interviews you can supplement your own voice and positions about the “Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services” and establish a higher burden of proof on the various state programs before they are able to burgeon your family.

No matter which way you look at it, former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer as well as Washington State Senator Pam Roach believe that “Parental Rights Should Be Respected and Protected By All” and the great need for Child Protective Services to come under greater scrutiny of the general public.Please take a listen and spread the word.

Investigative News Report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8h4SOwWXdc

Stephen Baskerville Speaks out about Family Court

Stephen Baskerville Speaks out about Family Court

Dr. Stephen Baskerville speaks out about the fear the Family courts put in all law biding parents......... Needlessly.

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-7559060823804547798&hl=en&fs=true

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Excellent Video, Excellent Bill, for the sake of CHILDREN ALL OVER ( not only in MN but all through the USA ), We Hope that the law will be made IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHILDREN and that this law becomes a NATIONAL LAW.

Parents have enough trouble picking up their lives with out being forced to FIGHT against each other to gain access to their own children, THE LAW SHOULD PRESUME Each parent is an equally good parent and award 50/50 Joint Legal Physical custody automatically! The courts have no right to interfere in forcing any other outcome with out REAL evidence of wrong doing by the other parent (false abuse accusations)! Real evidence does not equal bogus, fact less false charges picked out of an attorneys book of dirty tricks (known as "Silver Bullets" tricks to steal kids from a father that courts automatically fall for).

My experience of Family Courts suggests mediators, judges (in my case at least) is that they should rot in hell for crimes against humanity for persecuting children and innocent parents. These "professionals" have the power to abduct our children on a whim and based on no evidence of wrong doing, powers that violate every tenant of our constitution.

Most "professionals" that I have interacted with in this corrupt system (4 year case, 8 judges....!) are ignorant, self consumed in their own importance, prejudiced, gender biased and are incapable of following the laws that are supposed to guide them. According to our constitution they do not have the power to do what they do and yet they force parents to fight for access to their own children.

The morons that pretend to act for the benefits of our children should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity and failing to uphold our Constitution! They torture thousands of children every year and destroy parents for wanting to exercise their constitutional rights to parent their own children!

In my forty plus years I have never dealt with such an incompetent organization (Family court, Child custody mediation services) or dealt with people that care so little for the children they pretend to be working for.

These organizations and the people that helped traumatize and abduct my children are the antithesis of everything that the US and the US Constitution stands for... I look forward to seeing these organizations dismantled and these professional liars and cheats personally dragged through the courts for years (like they have done to us) and personally fined, ruined and imprisoned for child cruelty and inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on parents and children.

Stolen Vows: http://www.stolenvows.com/

The story of Stolen Vows
Designed by those who would benefit most, no-fault divorce laws were rolled out across the country over thirty years ago. Wedding day promises lost all meaning when the newly-coined standard — Irretrievable Breakdown — replaced former ‘grounds’ for divorce. Within fifteen years each state had its own unique ‘no-fault’ language but the results were virtually the same when couples got to court. The judge was empowered to 'force' a divorce on an unwitting spouse and then divide up the family belongings — including the children. Lawyers used unscrupulous tactics to crush any lingering affection in order to deliver the final product — divorce. Capitalizing on the nation's growing misery, a profitable Divorce Industry arose and wiped away any lingering hope that was embodied in the original cornerstone of the divorce reform movement — the ‘Marriage Hospital’ that could attend to the Family Court 'casualties' and enhance opportunities for reconciliation. Learn how scoundrels got hold of this original high-minded ideal and turned it into a sinister scheme. Those whose role was to ‘protect’ the institution that is the foundation of family and society ravaged it instead. But a new wind is blowing in the land. Once the spell is broken and the veil of illusion is lifted, we can finally roll up our sleeves and begin the job of building the ‘Marriage Hospital’.

LEARN MORE about the 'inside' story of No-Fault Divorce: the UMDA
The blueprint that would influence legislators nationwide was designed by a handful of 'insiders' and then endorsed by the ABA. Deception was used to sell the product which was 'camouflaged' in order to avoid facing the truth of what was being proposed: to undermine the Rule of Law.

Presumed Guity - reported on KQED Radio

Thu, Nov 20, 2008 -- 7:37 AM

Presumed Guilty
Attorney Brian Dinday says too often local prosecutors won't drop domestic violence cases -- even when they know the accusations are false.

Break through against the failings of VWA!

Crespo v. Crespo

Crespo v. Crespo is a decision by a trial court in New Jersey establishing that proof of domestic violence requires clear and convincing evidence by virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.^[1]

The court applied Mathews v. Eldridge to reject the "preponderance of the evidence" standard previously applied to allegations of domestic violence.

References

1. ↑ http://www.falseallegations.com/crespo-v-crespo-nj-schultz-decision-61908.htm

Alan Karmin of RADAR: Domestic Violence Awareness Month and the Facts

The Complete Alec Baldwin

Here, thanks to our video partners over at Fora.tv, the C-SPAN of the internet, is a full recording of the appearance at The Commonwealth Club this past Monday by actor/author Alec Baldwin. Posted by John Z. at 8:35 AM

Get the facts!!

GTF

We are fighting for equal parenting for two FIT parents. The opposition to that simple concept includes those who profit from big custody battles (lawyers, judges, magistrates), social workers and psychologists who's jobs depend on children in turmoil, and the radical man haters that argue that any man who wants to spend time with his child rather than cozying up to ESPN Sports Center must be a pedophile child abuser.

Let's not forget the ever so powerful men (either politically or financially) who rip children away from their mothers because they view them as just another conquest. These are the despicable men who pay off, sleep with, or otherwise influence Judges, magistrates, social workers and psychologists to rule in their favor, only to leave children alone most of the time while they tend to their other conquests

Gender isn't the issue - equal parenting is. Children need both parents.

Let's take a look at the facts:

According to US Census bureau data, 84.4% of non-custodial parents are men. Approximately 9% of these men did not want to be fathers when their children were born. A smaller percentage were abusers either of the children or the mothers, as abusers they should be convicted and imprisoned for their crimes.

The rest of them - NOT ABUSERS!

Clearly we can't apply a law depriving children of their fathers based on the exception rather than the rule.

Numerous studies also show that children from fatherless homes are more likely to be poor, become involved in drug and alcohol abuse, drop out of school, and suffer from health and emotional problems. Boys are more likely to become involved in crime, and girls are more likely to become pregnant as teens.

Here are some more interesting facts straight from the floor of the US Senate:
Source - Senate Concurrent Resolution 121

(1) in approximately 84 percent of the cases where a parent is absent, that parent is the father;

(2) if current trends continue, half of all children born today will live apart from one of their parents, usually their father, at some point before they turn 18 years old;

(3) where families (whether intact or with a parent absent) are living in poverty, a significant factor is the father's lack of job skills;

(4) committed and responsible fathering during infancy and early childhood contributes to the development of emotional security, curiosity, and math and verbal skills;

(5) an estimated 19,400,000 children (27 percent) live apart from their biological fathers; and

(6) 40 percent of the children under age 18 not living with their biological fathers had not seen their fathers even once in the past 12 months, according to national survey data;

90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census.

80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes. Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26, 1978.

60% of repeat rapists grew up without fathers. Raymond A. Knight and Robert A. Prentky, "The Developmental Antecednts of Adult Adaptations of Rapist Sub-Types," Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol 14, Dec., 1987, p 403-426.

71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father. US Dept. of Health & Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999.

63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census.

85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. Center for Disease Control.

90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother. Wray Herbert, "Dousing the Kindlers," Psychology Today, January, 1985, p.28.

71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools.

75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse canters come from fatherless homes. Rainbows for all God`s Children.

70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father. US Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988.

85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections, 1992.

75% of prisoners grew up without a father. Daniel Amneus, The Garbage Generation, Alhambra, CA: Primrose Press, 1990.

Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999.

43% of US children live without their father. US Department of Census.

Two years after divorce, 51% of children in sole mother custody homes only see their father once or twice a year, or never. Guidubaldi, 1989; Guidubaldi, 1988; Guidubaldi, Perry, & Nastasi, 1987.

42% of fathers fail to see their children at all after divorce. Frank F. Furstenberg, Jr. and Christine Winguist Nord, "Parenting Apart," Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol 47, no. 4, November, 1985.

90% of father disengagement is caused by obstruction of access by a custodial parent anxious to break the father-child ties. Kruk, 1992, cited by Prof. John Guidubaldi in his Minority Report and Policy Recommendations of the US Commission on Child & Family Welfare, US Code Citation: 42 USC 12301, 1996. Same cause identified by Braver, Wolchik, & Sandler, 1985, without incidence values.

PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS TO BE TREATED AS AN EQUAL PARENT!